Students and graduate students publish articles for successful certification. Although supervisors or third-party reviewers should write the review, often they do not want to spend their time on it, and then the student himself is forced to figure out how to write a review of the article. Lets find out how to write a review with help of https://editius.com/ professional writers.
Assigning a review of a scientific article
If the article is planned for publication in a peer-reviewed journal, it must be accompanied by a review by a person with a degree in the specialty related to the subject of the article. This is a kind of "quality mark". In some journals, a review is required for all articles without exception, in others only for those written by students and graduate students (if the author himself has an academic degree, a review is not requested).
A review is not a completely independent work, but a kind of secondary product created on the basis of the reviewed article.
To write a competent review, https://editius.com/essay-checker/ writers recommend that you must:
- Carefully read the peer-reviewed article.
- Find and study a sample of a review for a scientific article (it is better for the VAK journal, since they impose more stringent requirements for reviews, and the quality of such a sample will be higher).
- Following the example of a review of an article by the Higher Attestation Commission, make your own review (containing an assessment of the desired article).
What should a review of a scientific article contain?
In essence, a review is a review. A review can be written for any work - a book, a play, a film. A review of a scientific article has several distinctive features:
- The style of the review should correspond to the style of the article - be scientific, not artistic.
- Peer review of a scientific article is carried out before publication and contains an opinion on whether it is worth publishing at all.
Although the rules for writing a review of an article in accordance with methodology are not defined, you can find advices at https://editius.com/resume-review/ which are generally accepted main components of a review:
- Abstract analysis of the article. A person who has not read the article should understand what it is about, what position the author adheres to.
- Evaluation of novelty - whether the article proposes something fundamentally new, or systematizes existing points of view, or simply repeats other people's research.
- Assessment of the quality of the content of the article, the depth of research of the material.
- Formatting Compliance Assessment - Formatting requirements vary from journal to journal, so the reviewer should consider where the publication is planned.
- The modernity and relevance of the article (and the materials used in it).